The book is amazing in its descriptive qualities considering it is a historical novel and Leo himself was born in 1828, and the "War and Peace" concerns the time of 1805 to 1812, during the Napoleonic wars in Russia.
At first I found the book rather boring, seeming more like Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous instead of an important novel about war. However, as it reached the first battles of Austerlitz, the fuller the characters took in ones minds.
Tolstoy has a descriptive quality that makes it feel like he was there. Like he was dreaming the reality and sharing it with the world. He has a way of molding the characters as a whole. They are three-dimensional and not flat. Some of the characters I hated, some I loved, and often, they were the same characters. My favorite was Pierre Basuhoff (sp? as I did not actually read, but listened to the book) . He starts out as a partying youth who participates in drunken festivities such as tying a policeman to a bear. A fella like that can't be all bad.
The war descriptions are amazing. They have qualities in only stories that I've been told by vets and works I've read by boy soldiers. He describes well the effects war has on the people during times of relative peace, i.e. not at war, as well.
All in all, although at times boring, the novel, "War and Peace," is well worth the read. I feel like I got something out of it.
The above photograph of Leo Tolstoy was taken in 1908 and is an actual color photograph. In other words, it is not Turnerized, but an actual color photograph by a pioneer in color photography, Prokudin-Gorskii.
I've also read a little that Tolstoy was quite the peace activist especially later in life. I won't hold that against him, however.
ADDENDUM
I would like to point out something that interested me about the wars in this book compared to the wars of today.
In the wars between Russia and France, the teams were rather close to equal. The fighting was nasty, bloody, up close and personal. The generals and the rest of the rank fought beside the grunts, as it were. The rich fought just as hard as the grunts, the rich were just as cowardly as the grunts. They were all side by side in the nastiness that is known as war.
Observers were common. You could ride out onto the field and watch war. The people fighting it would not support you, like feed you like they would the fighters. But you could watch, stand under fire, maybe get killed, as long as you stayed out of the way.
Not so today. You would never see the likes of that POS Tony Hayward, fighting beside the grunts who Obomber and Killary want to start slaughtering Iranians with and already have and are slaughtering Iraqi's and Afghani's. You won't see the generals and fighting side by side with their men.
Nor are the sides close to even. The U.S. is overwhelming in its Blitzkrieg of military might and technology. Yet, oddly, unlike in "War and Peace," there are no clear winners in these illegal and genocidal wars started by mass murderer George Bush and perpetuated by mass murderer Barack Obama, aka Obomber. With no where near the military might, the Iraqi's and Afghani's are still fighting back.
I'm just sayin'.
To me, the best part of the novel is the ~100 page conclusion, where Tolstoy describes the inertia and inexorability of war.
ReplyDeletePierre Bezuhov is definitely a character that one will remember. His suffering as a POW changes him in a way that all his previous searching failed to do.
This novel is one of the four or five books that has changed my life.
Interesting to read your comments, Eugene. Thanks.
I liked the conclusion as well, though some of it was redundant with stuff said about the war in the novel.
ReplyDeleteI can see how the novel changed your life, and if I had read this when I was younger, say, in high school, I would say the same for me. However, having developed my understanding of war over the years through reading and discussions with veterans, I would just say it added to what I already knew.
I wish, however, that it had more of the influence and work of the masses who were not wealthy elites. There was a little of that, but very little. It would have been nice to hear more of the voices of the poor and those who were coerced into the military as well as the effects on their families.
I really enjoyed the novel much more than I thought I would, however.